Loading moment
A new day, a new controversy in TPOT. It all started when Emanuele cloned Theo’s MIT-licensed T3 Code into Synara, stripped original copyright from the LICENSE in later commits, and claimed it was built from scratch rather than a fork. Commit history exposed the T3 origins. Theo publicly called the attribution removal illegal. Emanuele apologized and restored the MIT license.
wasn’t there a “based on t3 code” link in the footer of synara’s landing page though? am i misremembering?
(This is illegal btw)
He’s also harassing my team over his own misunderstandings and illegal activity. I think I might actually have to phone my lawyers on this one.
He is concerned his work isn’t being valued properly. His “work” of setting up codex to auto clone our cool features (he admitted to this) He still claims he built Synara “from scratch”. Game over, Emanuele. The world will now see your lies.
He has apologized.
More stupid people going public with their stupidity, damn. Didn’t realize how many devs straight up don’t know the basics of attribution 🙃
Fwiw, he didn’t seem to understand the difference between “fork”, “clone” and “from scratch”. Personally, I think you should use dev tools made by people who know the difference. 🤷
Lmaooooo
it was because long time ago it was since they diverged a lot it is pointless to keep it there but i still say it started from t3 im not hiding
maybe this will help
Fun fact about Synara: Synara was never a fork of T3 Code, it was a clone. I always got those mixed up I cloned T3 Code at the end of march, when the codex app-server wasn't even available So Synara was built from the ground up First name was DP Code, then I decided to give
i also aaid that i always got those mixed uo because i didnt know the difference between them also if a repo is forked shouldn’t you see something like “forked from x repo” on github anyway?
ah didn’t know
you do realize there's commit history, right?
I want to apologize for my ignorance. I changed the MIT license without realising it and I didn’t understand the importance of it I truly apologize and I will make amends because I want to do things the right way I want to apologize to @theo for this huge inconvenience and for
So... this whole drama started over a free, open-source fork changing one line in the MIT license. Yeah, the MIT violation is real. But that's not where it started , they found that later. Early on, it was just criticism about how "weird" the product was. Honestly, it looks
i also aaid that i always got those mixed uo because i didnt know the difference between them also if a repo is forked shouldn’t you see something like “forked from x repo” on github anyway?
Dude it’s in your screenshots lmao @theo
